Ben White recommends Roger Garaudy essay in ‘Israeli Apartheid Guide’

Ben White writes on Liberal Conspiracy:

‘A favourite tactic of die-hard defenders of Israel is to smear critics of the country’s policies through guilt by association, lies, and decontextualised quotations.’

White’s article is analysed by Modernity here. White draws attention to a letter he put together with Philip Rizk on Israel’s 60th birthday, which contained the admirable sentiment:

‘We recognise that today, millions of Israelis and Jews around the world will joyfully mark the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the state of Israel (Yom Ha’atzmaut). For many, this landmark powerfully symbolises the Jewish people’s ability to defy the power of hatred so destructively embodied in the Nazi Holocaust.’

The letter is nicely put together and rightly calls for Christians to consider Palestinians as well as Israelis, concluding:

‘We therefore urge all those working for peace and justice in Israel/Palestine to consider that any lasting solution must be built on the foundation of justice, which is rooted in the very character of God. After all, it is justice that “will produce lasting peace and security” (Isaiah 32:17). Let us commit ourselves in prophetic word and practical deed to a courageous settlement whose details will honour both peoples’ shared love for the land, and protect the individual and collective rights of Jews and Palestinians in the Holy Land.’

Distancing himself from an essay written on Counterpunch as a teenager in which he claimed to understand antisemitism, White protests:

‘The article was trying to look at causes for contemporary anti-semitism. Funnily enough, whenever the smear-merchants cite this piece, they miss out one of the reasons I propose, namely the “history of anti-Semitism” in European culture “that has been, and probably still is, embedded in collective consciousness”. I note that “its roots can be traced, at least to some extent, to the shameful teachings of many in the Church”.’

Yet White himself has celebrated those Christians who seem to propagate such shameful teachings. White published an article on Electronic Intifada in praise of the theology of Donald Wagner, Stephen Sizer, Gary Burge and Colin Chapman. Whilst the anti-Zionism of these Christian teachers may be attractive to some who consider themselves left-wing, what is perhaps less well known is the theology which leads to such anti-Zionism. Burge links the Jewish right to a homeland with obedience to Torah. Chapman argued in his 1983 book Whose Promised Land? that, as Jewish people on the whole do not believe that Jesus is Messiah, they have lost all national privileges, including the right to self-determination.

Such Christians oppose Israel theologically, as they see it as the direct result of Jewish nationalism, and therefore disobedience to God (other states and nationalisms are curiously not condemned). You can hear a particularly vitriolic example of this amongst the archives of Stephen Sizer’s sermons: “I am the Vine, You are the branches”.

Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide comes with commendations from Stephen Sizer, Garth Hewitt (who apparently came up with the idea to re-write Christmas carols with anti-Zionist lyrics), Alex Awad, who alongside Sizer shared a platform with Holocaust denier Frederick Tobin to denounce Israel, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who thinks the Jewish lobby in America is “powerful, very powerful.” Whilst Desmond Tutu clearly has a good record on South African human rights, he clearly falls short on Israel/Jews .

If Ben White can make distinction between South African apartheid and ‘Israeli apartheid’ as he claims, can he not also differentiate between Tutu’s attitudes towards South Africans/South Africa and his attitudes towards Jews/Israel? Doesn’t this weaken his argument? Whilst Ben White denounces Church antisemitism as shameful, he is praised by those within the church who seem to project negative theological stereotypes of Jews and the Jewish nation. When that theology feeds directly into Israel-Palestine, it is legitimate to have concerns about antisemitism. (Imagine, for example, a book on contemporary African history and politics which cited Christian preachers who believe black people shouldn’t be allowed to run countries for theological reasons).

White also refers to a Christian peace organisation based in Leicester, the Leicestershire Holy Land Appeal, on page 99. White last accessed its website in November 2008. By that time, the website had a cartoon competition for English and Palestinian children comparing the Israeli security fence to a dragon.

Writing about Popular Committees Against the Wall, White remarks:

In the village of Budrus, the first Committee was formed in the autumn months of 2003, quickly formulating rules for the organised protests against the Wall.*18 *18 See, for example Aboud village, where the Committee was formed in 2005, http://leicester-holyland.org.uk/18th%20%20November%202005.htm (last accessed 5 November 2008)

From the webpage cited, we read:

‘Sheikh [Taisir] Tamimi and Father [Atallah] Hanna said that the Palestinian People are determined to resist the Wall “which annexes the Palestinian orchards, and separates the people”.’

Hanna is the Greek Orthodox priest forced to step down in 2002 for alleged support of Palestinian suicide bombings against Israelis.

Thus the Christian leaders whom we read about and are referred to in Israeli Apartheid Guide are surely some cause for concern.

White also tackles another objection to his writings:

‘The second claim made against me is that I have defended Ahmadinejad’s Holocaust denial. This is again based on one article, written in January 2006. The piece was critiquing the mainstream analysis of some recent remarks by Ahmadinejad, and the politicised context in which they were being framed. But I make no bones about it – Ahmadinejad is either a Holocaust denier himself, or cowardly encourages those who are (and probably both). As Dana Goldstein observed earlier this year, Ahmadinejad wraps “his Holocaust-denial in a series of legitimate criticisms of present-day Israeli policy”, a disturbing “mixing of fiction and fact”. Ahmadinejad’s anti-semitism is morally despicable, intellectually vacuous, and of no benefit to the people he purports to be supporting (or rather, exploiting), the Palestinians. He is also, of course, ruthless in his approach to dissent, and has the blood of his own people on his hands (as I noted in both that 2006 article, and more recently, this interview with an Iranian journalist).’

White here provides admirable condemnation of Ahmadinejad, which you won’t find in his original article. As White points out, he wrote the article in January 2006 – the same month that Iran announced plans for a Holocaust review conference (this news, ironically, came 15th January four days after White’s article was published). Days later, Iran’s NEDA Institute approached Robert Faurisson for asssistance with Holocaust denial material.

In Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide, on page 73 White cites the Lawrence of Cyberia blog for a narrative about the Israeli ‘Separation Wall.’ Yet as late as July 2008, Lawrence of Cyberia was still arguing that Ahmadinejad was not a Holocaust denier. Which begs the question, if Ben White is clear about Ahmadinejad’s Holocaust denial, why trust a blogger who isn’t clear on this as a reliable source?

Finally, and most seriously, Ben White includes a Roger Garaudy essay on Zionism in his ’select bibliography’ (p.162) of Israeli Apartheid Guide. Garaudy was convicted of Holocaust denial in France in 1998 under France’s Gaysott Law.

The essay White recommends is ‘Religious and Historical Precepts of Zionism‘, from Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. VI, No. 2, Winter 1977. There is no Holocaust denial in this essay, in fact Garaudy sees Zionists as having taken their blueprint from Hitler and the Nazis, inverting antisemitism and the Nuremberg laws to create a Jewish state. Garaudy, in the essay that White recommends, cites Koestler (who in 1976 published the theory that Jews are really Khazars) and Israel Shahak’s writings on Zionism.

However, it is no longer 1977, but 2009, and Garaudy’s Holocaust denial should mean that White does not treat Garaudy as a serious author, any more than White would respect Ahmadinejad as a serious commentator in the light of Ahmadinejad’s Holocaust denial and antisemitism. Given that Ben White claims that his book is a “beginner’s guide”, is it really appropriate to present Holocaust deniers as legitimate historians and commentators to newcomers to the Israel-Palestine debate? And given White’s forceful and welcome condemnation of Ahmadinejad’s mixture of ‘fact and fiction’, will there be a similar condemnation of Garaudy’s?

Advertisements

27 Comments

Filed under apartheid analogy

27 responses to “Ben White recommends Roger Garaudy essay in ‘Israeli Apartheid Guide’

  1. White flag

    Great research Mordechai

  2. Pingback: Ben White, Stop Digging. « ModernityBlog

  3. modernityblog

    Cracking article, shame that the discussion at Liberal Conspiracy descended into a slanging match, and didn’t cover Whites numerous doctored quotes and sourcing from a Holocaust denier?

  4. zkharya

    Seismic, what is the context of White’s citing the essay: what point does he seek to bolster by it?

  5. zkharya

    “In 1954, in the introduction to The History of the Haganah, published by the World Zionist Organization, he wrote: “At the present time we speak of colonization, and only of colonization. It is our short term objective. But it is clear that England belongs to the English, Egypt to the Egyptians and Judea to the Jews. In our country there is room only for Jews. We will say to the Arabs: ‘Move over’; if they are not in agreement, if they resist, we will push them by force.” ”

    Garaudy does not offer a proper citation for this. Where did he get it?

  6. seismicshock

    Hi Zak, it’s recommended in the ‘Select Bibliography’ (p.162) rather than directly cited. He wants ‘beginners’ to read Garaudy. I’m not sure, I’ll research that quote, although I’m not too hopeful for historical accuracy from Roger Garaudy.

  7. modernityblog

    I assume that it is another fake quote from Ben-Gurion.

    It would hardly be out of keeping, given Garaudy’s ‘revisionist’ views.

  8. Dooley

    awesome article

  9. zkharya

    Thanks, Seismic. Well, well. So Mr White recommends that article because he thinks it offers insight into Israel and Zionism for beginners. Oh dear.

  10. Pingback: Ben White’s questionable book « Engage – the anti-racist campaign against antisemitism

  11. Pingback: The Theology Behind the ‘Israeli Apartheid’ Gospel « Seismic Shock

  12. zkharya

    “Funnily enough, whenever the smear-merchants cite this piece, they miss out one of the reasons I propose, namely the “history of anti-Semitism” in European culture “that has been, and probably still is, embedded in collective consciousness”. I note that “its roots can be traced, at least to some extent, to the shameful teachings of many in the Church”.’”

    Is wholly insufficient. The key church teaching here is the one it has taught ab initio i.e. not only are Jews a national group, they are a national group dispossessed of temple, city and land as a punishment for their rejection of Jesus and the prophets.

    (How different the standard applied by Ben White to his fellow Palestinian Christians (and, by extension, Muslims)! If that is not partisanship, what is?)

    By all means repent of this now, 2000 years too late, when, in no small part as a result, in the 19th and 20th centuries most Jews of European Christendom are killed or effectively driven out, before 1914 mostly to America, after 1914 mostly to Palestine of what became Israel (and let’s not get started on the Jews of Islam).

    But do not instance the victims pay the price for it all over again by the dissolution of their state.

    And it’s no good saying, What has this to do with Palestinians?

    Palestinian Christians and Muslims are among those Christians and Muslims in the world who most believed in Jews’ being a national group dispossessed.

    Did their Christianity or Islam lead them to sympathy with the victim, to grant them some measure of right to return or to find refuge, or justice? (yet this is precisely what Ben White insists Israeli Jews do for Palestinian Christians and Muslims -Christian nationalist hypocrite!)

    My eye it did.

    Wherefore for Ben White to judge Israeli Jews by the highest standard, be it Jewish, Christian (very Christian, ironically, hypocritically, actually) or Secular, but Palestinian Christians and Muslims merely by the standard of expediency is hypocrisy. Of which, being a student of the gospels, Ben White should know not a little.

  13. Pingback: Seismic Shock: one year on « Seismic Shock

  14. Pingback: Water World « Seismic Shock

  15. Pingback: By the company he keeps « Seismic Shock

  16. Pingback: Brian McLaren loves Israelis? « Seismic Shock

  17. Pingback: Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) a Christian response? | eChurch Christian Blog

  18. Pingback: Amnesty UK Promotes Ben White Again « Seismic Shock

  19. Pingback: Amnesty UK Promotes Ben White Again | eChurch Christian Blog

  20. Pingback: Meet The Cast Of “With God On Our Side” « Seismic Shock

  21. Pingback: Should Messianic Jews speak at Christian “anti-Zionist” conferences? « The Rosh Pina Project

  22. Pingback: Ben White, the riot clean-ups and “broadly white” “popular fascism” | Seismic Shock

  23. Pingback: Ben White, the riot clean-ups and “broadly white” “popular fascism” |

  24. Pingback: Christ at the Checkpoint speaker on the London riot clean-ups and “white fascism” |

  25. Pingback: Why is a liberal blog continuing to publish a defender of a homophobic hate preacher? | RichardMillett's Blog

  26. Pingback: Ben White understands that he justified antisemitism | The Warped Mirror

  27. Pingback: Yachad’s Ben White love-in. | RichardMillett's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s