Fidel Castro on Theological Antisemitism: Nothing New Under The Sun

Fidel Castro has made headlines today for “passing on a message to Ahmadinejad” through Jeffrey Goldberg’s Atlantic blog that theological anti-Semitism is a really silly thing, and deeply ingrained in the global consciousness. But this is not really news.

Nowhere in the article does Castro directly address Ahmadinejad. It seems that Goldberg wants to make Castro’s views somehow relevant for the current situation between Iran and Israel.

Here’s the key quote:

I asked him if he would tell Ahmadinejad what he was telling me. “I am saying this so you can communicate it,” he answered.

Not exactly a direct message to Ahmadinejad. You get the feeling that if Fidel Castro really wanted to say something politically relevant about Iran, he wouldn’t use a liberal blog to convey his message – considering how much mayhem Yoani Sanchez has caused the Castro regime.

Here’s are some of Castro’s thoughts on Jews from the 1985 book Fidel y la religión (via Dana Kaplan):

Holy Week in the countryside—I remember them from when I was very young—were days of solemnity; there was great solemnity. What was said? That Christ died on Good Friday. You couldn’t talk or joke or be happy, because Christ was dead and the Jews killed him every year. This is another case in which accusations or popular beliefs have caused tragedies and historic prejudices. I tell you, I didn’t know what that term meant, and I thought, at first, that those birds called judíos had killed Christ.

Castro repeated these thoughts in a speech before an audience of Jews and evangelicals in Havana in April 1990:

I remember that almost all the education in religious matters that was promoted with the people–not only with us in school but with even the poor people– everything related to the Holy Week, the myths of Holy Week; I remember–and I have talked about this–they talked to us about the Jews. We did not even know who the Jews were. They said they were the worst people in the world, that they had killed God. Since I reached the age of reason, we had to be quiet at home during Holy Week. [audience laughs] We had to be still; there was total mourning because God had died.

God died on Holy Friday, then came the resurrection and all those things. As I told Frei Betto in that book–I believe it is included in Frei Betto’s book–I thought Jews were black birds that make a lot of noise and live in the countryside. So for me they were [words indistinct] Imagine this in the Middle Ages, and this type of belief inculcated in a fanatical way. This would explain many of the problems that have developed throughout history: pogroms, persecution of the Jews.

This book on Fidel and religion was written as a dialogue between Castro and the Brazilian liberation theologian Frei Betto on religion.

Given Castro’s uncompromising stance on religion, some critics saw the book as a cynical attempt to engineer support from Latin American Christians sympathetic to liberation theology. Four years afterwards, Betto (aka Cardinal Carlos Alberto Libanio Christo) drew criticism from conservative clergy in Brazil for his expressed support of the Castro regime. Betto has since cited the supposed “life of luxury” of Yoani Sanchez as proof that Cuba is actually quite a free country.

Intriguingly, Betto is now the spiritual mentor of Brazil’s president Lulu, and has overseen a number of admirable social projects – most importantly the Zero Hunger programme.

If Fidel Castro wanted to pass on a message about theological anti-Semitism to Ahmadinejad, surely someone like Frei Betto would be his preferred channel – especially given the developing friendship between Lulu and Ahmadinejad.

But surely Fidel wouldn’t pass on progressive messages through a liberal blogger. That’s just not his style.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Fidel Castro on Theological Antisemitism: Nothing New Under The Sun

  1. amie

    Joseph: This week on HP, we have already seen a retraction/correction of a post unfavourable to Israel. A similar update from you would be in order, on your Fear in Oxford post, on the allegations (including the limp handshake) that Dr Argov was dismissed because she converted to Christianity, where you wrote:
    “Here is a woman who has made a personal faith decision which does not affect her professional capabilities, and yet she has seemingly had a horrific time in her department because of her beliefs. Dr Argov clearly feels ostracised, although ultimately it will be for the tribunal to decide upon this matter.”
    Well, the tribunal has ruled:
    “Dr Argov had “made serious personal allegations that we reject, and that she has on occasion refused to acknowledge the plain written evidence which was before her and the tribunal”.
    Based on careful examination of the evidence and on the fact that they “found her to be an unreliable witness,” they dismissed all of her complaints of discrimination.
    It found inter alia that “The alleged discriminator, Dr Ariel, did not know of [her] religious faith at the time he made the allegedly discriminatory decision.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s